Thirty years ago, Nicholas Kingsley (late of this parish as it were) wrote an article for Country Life on the ‘conundrum’ of how Sir Robert Atkyns chose the places which Johannes Kip was asked to draw and engrave for inclusion in his Ancient and Present State of Glostershire published in 1712. Although there are 65 illustrations in the book, 60 of them the houses of the county gentry (61 counting Chepstow Castle which was not in Gloucestershire but was linked through the lord of the manor of Tidenham and the bridge over the Wye), there were yet others he might well have chosen. As we know, Gloucestershire was a big county, including those parishes in the diocese of Bristol when it was created in 1542 and much more recently in Avon and then in South Gloucestershire local authority areas. It must have taken Kip a considerable amount of time to travel around the whole county, as well as staying in each place long enough to carry out a simple survey and then to draw it. Kingsley suggested therefore he may not have been able to reach the farther bounds of the county. The engravings are a unique resource and particular ones are frequently used by local historians. The Gloucestershire Gardens and Landscape Trust is one such, using them to examine historic gardens and compare them with the present day.

Shipton Moyne, The Seat of Walter Estcourt, Esq. drawn and etched by Johannes Kip [1712] re-issued 1768 (image taken from https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/830259)
So one response to Kingsley’s article now possible after studying Atkyns is a robust defence of Atkyns and Kip’s coverage of the county. Marking on a map all the houses that were illustrated shows that they were exceedingly well spread round the county. It’s clear that there were clusters of several within a short distance of each other, which was entirely practical, but there were some on the farthest boundaries of Gloucestershire and there was no significantly large area with none at all. There is more to be found out about how the ones to be drawn were selected, and to some extent it will always be impossible to know much without being able to talk to Sir Robert or Mr J Kip. But the achievement of the two men in the conditions of early 18th century travel are remarkable.
by Anthea Jones, Gloucestershire Archives researcher.
Anthea,
One thing which I would have published in the planned 2008 edition of Gloucestershire Country Houses (which was scuppered by Phillimore going bust), was the discovery that William Blathwayt paid Kip £6 9s 0d ‘for Drawing & Engraving the House & Garden etc. for Sr Robert Atkins survey of the County’ in September 1710 (Glos Archives, D1799 A26). Despite this, he also later paid for his copy of the book! Almost certainly this means that most if not all of the plates were subscribed in the same way, with Atkyns encouraging landowners to stump up for their house to be included. It would be interesting to explore whether there is an recognisable bias in the political affiliations of those whose houses are included, or whether it was more a matter of ‘county feeling’ than personal support for Atkyns. The date of the payment is also helpful, since it pins down when Kip was travelling around making his drawings, and may help to explain why some houses are not included: Bourton House at Bourton-on-the-Hill was almost certainly being rebuilt at that time, for example.
Nick
LikeLike